The issue of computer filters in Washington State libraries has been in the news recently with the Eastern Washington Federal District Court ruling that the North Central Regional Library's practice of using filters doesn't violate the First Amendment. Apparently, some patrons filed the lawsuit because the filters didn't allow them to view websites that were research-oriented, such as those for youth and tobacco use, firearms for hunters, and art.
As a librarian, I'm all for protecting the freedom of speech. It's my job to help patrons obtain the information they're seeking, whether those patrons are minors or adults. My role is not that of a censor; I'm not here to make judgments on the materials patrons may or may not access. My role is that of facilitator between people and information sources, making it easier for people to find the materials they need.
I can understand that some libraries have chosen to use filters on computers to protect minors from information that many deem inappropriate for them. However, I believe those filters should be removed should a patron request their removal in order to do legitimate research. By no means do I advocate patrons using computers to conduct illegal transactions, view pornography, or do anything else that the greater part of society deems offensive. Nevertheless the right to obtain information that is Constitutionally-protected needs to be preserved. It's our right as Americans.
Freely yours from the perch.
No comments:
Post a Comment